New information unearthed by Jill Stanek shows that news outlets have played a cover-up by the Obama campaign over the candidate's opposition to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act.
Obama claimed his opposition to an Illinois version of the bill was only because it lacked a "neutrality clause" later inserted into the federal bill that protected Roe vs. Wade.
Not so, Stanek writes:
Since then we have found 2 separate documents proving Barack Obama has been misrepresenting facts.She links to the Illinois Senate Action Committee Report and other documents and news reports which, she writes, "prove that in March 2003, state Senator Obama, then the chairman of the IL state Senate Health and Human Services Committee, presided over a committee meeting in which the 'neutrality clause' (copied verbatim from the federal bill) was added to the state [Born Alive Infants Protection Act], with Obama voting in support of adding the revision. Yet, immediately afterwards, Obama led the committee Democrats in voting against the amended bill, and it was killed, 6-4."
In fact, Barack Obama is more liberal than any U.S. senator, voting against identical language of a bill that body passed unanimously, 98-0. In fact, Barack Obama condones infanticide if it would otherwise interfere with abortion.
Bloggers need to pick up on this story, since mainstream media outlets and liberal blogs that published the Obama campaign's version are unlikely to publish the true facts.